On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 09:45:48PM +0000, Paul Sladen wrote: > Patches 2a, 2b & 3 are the patches to pull in, the last of which is the > environment variable patch, but I'm not sure if that would get accepted > upstream, whereas adding an extra flag to the 'level' parameter of > zlib's compress2() might be more paletable.
This has already been reported to the Debian BTS as #290049. I would suspect that you are right to suggest that putting it into the API in some fashion would be more acceptable than the environment variable - it's more flexible and requires less of the system hosting the zlib application to be used. That said, I'd be somewhat reluctant to put any API change into the Debian package as a local change, though I'd be happy to help people work with upstream if people thought that was useful. Obviously, that wouldn't answer the immediate problem. An approach like using an environment variable or LD_PRELOAD would be a better candidate for a local change since it doesn't create visible incompatibilities. If there's work being done on this it would be very helpful if you could keep me in the loop. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
