Hi,

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:35:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Since the patch for #288284 will probably heavily depend on this one,
> I won't work on the #288284 patch until this one has been included
> into dpatch, since you might want to do changes to this patch that
> might in turn break any work already spent on #288284.

#288284 has a patch which addresses both #288284 and #288282.

Greetings
Marc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to