Dan Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. I hope it's OK for me to send an email reply to this. If not, > please excuse me.
Actually, debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org isn't the place to send it to, but rather [EMAIL PROTECTED] is. Then it's logged at http://bugs.debian.org/290101 in the Bug Tracking Tracking. But it was my fault for not setting a Mail-Followup-To field. > The > -output FILENAME > has to go in the > OPTIONS > part, before the command filename. > > But you're right, the syntax > gri test.gri my-file-name.ps > does not produce the named ps file, as would be implied by the > gri -help > output line > gri [OPTIONS] [command_file [postscript_file]] > > So, that's a bug in the > gri -help > output. However, this bug is not present in the "info" docs, which read > (in section 3.2) > gri [OPTIONS] [CmdFile [optional_arguments]] > > I'll report this bug to SF. Thanks for noting it. So Falk, the bug is in documentation and is now fixed in CVS. You must use the -output option to get the output to a differenty named file. Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 12.01.05 20:48:53: > > > The > > -output FILENAME > > has to go in the > > OPTIONS > > part, before the command filename. > > In my opinion, either this restriction should be lifted, or an error > should be flagged. Silently ignoring the option doesn't seem > sensible. Dan, isn't that a limit with the library used to get the options? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
