On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:46:32 -0500, Prarit Bhargava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Philip and Bartlomiej, > > I've been tracking an almost identical problem on my IA64 platform with > a bk pull that is about a month old. > > I tracked it down to a duplicate vector request of 0x38 = 56 by the > mmtimer -- take a look at /proc/interrupts, /proc/ioports, /proc/iomem > and see if anything has requested the specific area that your CD is > trying to get. > > My output looked like: > > SGIIOC4: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:01:01.0, revision 79 > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc00001080c200140-0xc00001080c200163 > Probing IDE interface ide0... > hda: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8588, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive > ide0: Disabled unable to get IRQ 56. > Probing IDE interface ide0... > hda: MATSHITADVD-ROM SR-8588, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive > hda: IRQ probe failed (0x4ffffffe) > Probing IDE interface ide1... > ide1: Wait for ready failed before probe ! > Probing IDE interface ide2... > ide2: Wait for ready failed before probe ! > Probing IDE interface ide3... > ide3: Wait for ready failed before probe ! > Probing IDE interface ide4... > ide4: Wait for ready failed before probe ! > Probing IDE interface ide5... > ide5: Wait for ready failed before probe ! > ide0: DISABLED, NO IRQ > > Bartlomiej, just a thought: > > I think that the output of the failures of the probes for non-existant > interfaces ide1-ide5 could be suppressed, no?
yes > What would you think if we only output the "failed before probe" > messages for interfaces that return -EBUSY from wait_hwif_ready? It > would make the system boot a lot "prettier":) care to make a patch? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
