Hi, Eric Valette wrote: > Well done guys. Could you backup your erroneous patches once again... > > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/09/msg00167.html> > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/09/msg00114.html>
What about being constructive and actually help find the bug instead of pointless trolling? Chris and me doubt that the patch (which is for _printing_ makes that difference (Chris doesn't see an error there),# although it magically disappeared when unapplying it. You obviously don't know how interesting bugs can get.) Oh, and the patch was applied in earlier 1.1.3's already. why didn't you report the bug there? because it didn't exist? or what? Or didn't you use 1.1.3-3 et al.? And you hopefully don't seriously suggest thatwe deliberately break printing again.... Trolling in this way does *not* help. You absolutely have no clue what it means to maintain such a beast. Oh, and not to forget. I run 1.1.3-4 on sid *without* those two bugs... And the other distributions using the *exact* same patches do not have visible problems either. Grüße/Regards, René PS: Your signature is too long. -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
