Your message dated Sun, 8 Jun 2025 08:12:03 +0200
with message-id <20250608061203.ga760...@subdivi.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1034579: GMock fails to pass a cross compiler again
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034579,
regarding GMock fails to pass a cross compiler again
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1034579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034579
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cmake-extras
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: important
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
Control: affects -1 + src:biometryd
Hi,
the 1.6-1 upload has a noticeable regression. It reverts #973580
claiming it was fixed upstream. The referenced MR
https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/cmake-extras/-/merge_requests/4
is still open. Yet the patch has been dropped in 1.6-1. It still is
needed. Now any package that uses include(GMock) fails to cross build
from source. Can you reinstate the patch? I think this can be eligible
for bookworm as you'd be reverting a faulty revert.
Helmut
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.8-1
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 10:26:42PM +0000, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Di 18 Apr 2023 23:06:15 CEST, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > the 1.6-1 upload has a noticeable regression. It reverts #973580
> > claiming it was fixed upstream. The referenced MR
> > https://gitlab.com/ubports/development/core/cmake-extras/-/merge_requests/4
> > is still open. Yet the patch has been dropped in 1.6-1. It still is
> > needed. Now any package that uses include(GMock) fails to cross build
> > from source. Can you reinstate the patch? I think this can be eligible
> > for bookworm as you'd be reverting a faulty revert.
>
> is the above still an issue with cmake-extras 1.8-1? The reference MR is
> part of that release now.
You nailed it. You can easily double check at
https://crossqa.debian.net/src/biometryd and see that the most recent
build succeeded with 1.8-1 while the previous build using 1.7-3 failed.
In general, please close cross build bugs when you think they're
probably are done.
Helmut
--- End Message ---
