Your message dated Tue, 03 Jun 2025 11:14:40 +0000
with message-id <309de2b52e846f0a2686a97d42f52...@posteo.de>
and subject line next time please close yourself
has caused the Debian Bug report #856200,
regarding latexdiff: New upstream website
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
856200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856200
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: latexdiff
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

the "homepage" link on the debian tracker is not correct. The official homepage
incl. upstream-source and bug-tracker is
<https://github.com/ftilmann/latexdiff>

Maybe this will fix the problem on the debian-tracker
"Problems while searching for new upstream version"

kind



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.10.0-towo.3-siduction-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages latexdiff depends on:
ii  perl  5.24.1-1

Versions of packages latexdiff recommends:
ii  texlive-generic-recommended  2016.20170123-4
ii  texlive-latex-base           2016.20170123-4
ii  texlive-latex-extra          2016.20170123-4

Versions of packages latexdiff suggests:
ii  git         1:2.11.0-2
ii  subversion  1.9.5-1

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- I am closing this because the answer from Salvatore seems to "fix" this issue and explain why it is invalid.

Dear Salvatore, next time please close it yourself. It is harmful for Debian projects reputation if ticktes are open to long without any activity.
--- End Message ---

Reply via email to