Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:40:19 +0200
with message-id <aa1eswpigeucu...@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1104096: nfsdctl: lockd configuration failure reported 
after updating to nfs-utils-2.8.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104096,
regarding nfs-kernel-server: exports file is not parsed or nfsdctl: lockd 
configuration failure is reported when parsing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1104096: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:2.8.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: patrickjrdunf...@gmail.com




-- Package-specific info:
-- rpcinfo --
   program vers proto   port  service
    100000    4   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    3   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    4   udp    111  portmapper
    100000    3   udp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
    100024    1   udp  50501  status
    100024    1   tcp  51701  status
    100005    1   udp  37504  mountd
    100005    1   tcp  57573  mountd
    100005    2   udp  52838  mountd
    100005    2   tcp  49829  mountd
    100005    3   udp  55115  mountd
    100005    3   tcp  38111  mountd
    100003    3   tcp   2049  nfs
    100003    4   tcp   2049  nfs
    100227    3   tcp   2049  nfs_acl
    100021    1   udp  56162  nlockmgr
    100021    3   udp  56162  nlockmgr
    100021    4   udp  56162  nlockmgr
    100021    1   tcp  41149  nlockmgr
    100021    3   tcp  41149  nlockmgr
    100021    4   tcp  41149  nlockmgr
-- /etc/default/nfs-kernel-server --
RPCNFSDPRIORITY=0
NEED_SVCGSSD=""
-- /etc/nfs.conf --
[general]
pipefs-directory=/run/rpc_pipefs
[nfsrahead]
[exports]
[exportfs]
[gssd]
[lockd]
[exportd]
[mountd]
manage-gids=y
[nfsdcld]
[nfsd]
[statd]
[sm-notify]
[svcgssd]
-- /etc/nfs.conf.d/*.conf --

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.12.21-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on:
ii  keyutils                1.6.3-6
ii  libblkid1               2.41-4
ii  libc6                   2.41-7
ii  libcap2                 1:2.75-6
ii  libevent-core-2.1-7t64  2.1.12-stable-10+b1
ii  libnl-3-200             3.7.0-2
ii  libnl-genl-3-200        3.7.0-2
ii  libreadline8t64         8.2-6
ii  libsqlite3-0            3.46.1-3
ii  libtirpc3t64            1.3.6+ds-1
ii  libuuid1                2.41-4
ii  libwrap0                7.6.q-36
ii  libxml2                 2.12.7+dfsg+really2.9.14-0.4
ii  netbase                 6.5
ii  nfs-common              1:2.8.3-1
ii  ucf                     3.0051

Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server recommends:
ii  python3       3.13.2-2
ii  python3-yaml  6.0.2-1+b2

Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server suggests:
ii  procps  2:4.0.4-8

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi

So conclusive, as explained by upstream:

1. the nfsdctl error is harmless, and if nfs-utils used with kernel
   which does not support the netlink control interfaces for knfsd
   then falls back to start the server with rpc.nfsd and this is
   indeed the case.

2. the previous starting with nfsdctl autostart was actually a
   regression now fixed with 2.8.3, since older nfsdctl just ingored the
   lockd parameters in nfs.conf nd would not have configured it properly
   so technically a regression from 1:2.6.2-4+deb12u1 in bookworm to the
   2.8.2 based version previously, and now fixed in 2.8.3.

Closing thus the issue.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to