Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:34:34 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id 
<alpine.deb.2.21.2504230933470.16...@postfach.intern.alteholz.me>
and subject line Re: RM: raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm 
which is not provided on arm*
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103962,
regarding RM: raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not 
provided on arm*
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1103962: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103962
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, 
debian-...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:raku
User: ftp.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64 armel armhf
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm arm64 armel armhf
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 RM: dh-raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm 
which is not provided on arm*

Currently, moarvm and nqp packages have a bug on arm that can't be
reproduced. This bug triggers a random crash and can trip build on
nqp, rakudo and all raku modules.

The short term solution is to disable build on all arm arches until
this bug is sorted out. This means that trixie will be released
without raku on ARM. Hopefully, we will be able to enable again builds
on arm later on.

moarvm was removed from testing and unstable on arm*. Now all raku
modules must also be removed from arm architectures.

All the best

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

I am not really sure why you request the removal of an arch:all package from a 
specific architecture.
So closing this bug again ...

  Thorsten

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to