Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:56:08 +0800
with message-id
<CAKq8=3+0eukh0+-skg53lbgs+e9udezbvbwlkkbnu+ahfef...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1103395: RFS: ananta/1.1.3-1 [ITP] -- parallel SSH
command execution tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103395,
regarding RFS: ananta/1.1.3-1 [ITP] -- parallel SSH command execution tool
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1103395: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ananta":
* Package name : ananta
Version : 1.1.3-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/cwt/ananta/issues
* URL : https://hg.sr.ht/~cwt/ananta
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/eastdong/ananta
Section : python
It builds the following binary package:
ananta - parallel SSH command execution tool
The package is a lightweight command-line utility to run commands in
parallel via SSH on multiple remote hosts. It is especially useful
for system administrators managing distributed environments.
The package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net and is available
at:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ananta/
Alternatively, you can download it with dget:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/ananta/ananta_1.1.3-1.dsc
This is a new package. I have filed an ITP bug (#1103053) which this
upload intends to close.
---
While the package builds and installs successfully, I would like to
ask for help regarding the following Lintian informational tag:
> I: ananta source: no-dh-sequencer [debian/rules]
Although I'm using a standard `dh $@ --buildsystem=pybuild` rule and
the package appears to function correctly, I am unsure how to eliminate
this tag or whether it is safe to ignore. I'd greatly appreciate any
pointers or guidance on best practice for this case.
Thank you for your time and helpful suggestions so far. I look forward
to any reviews, feedback, or sponsorship.
Best regards,
EastDong Xu
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:15 PM Phil Wyett <philip.wy...@kathenas.org> wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 +confirmed
>
> Xu Dong,
>
Uploaded, thanks!
BR,
Bo
--- End Message ---
