Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:14:36 +0100
with message-id <z3vb3fv_h3c2t...@per.namespace.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1091846: no package libsfdo
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091846,
regarding no package libsfdo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1091846: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091846
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libsfdo
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: wishlist
Distribution: unstable/testing
I use labwc compositor and I recently updated to the unstable version
0.8.2. In the upstream release libfsdo is mentioned as an optional build
dependency and runtime dependency, however if it is not present,
application icons are unable to be used resulting in a stark look. Labwc,
tries to be like Openbox in terms of usability and look and feel and without
application icons it falls short.
It appears no package libsfdo has ever existed on debian.
The developer page is: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vyivel/libsfdo
System: Linux dellhome 6.12.6-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.12.6-1
(2024-12-21) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thank you.
Regards,
Mick Amadio.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 09:23:36PM +1000, Mick A wrote:
> Package: libsfdo
[..]
> It appears no package libsfdo has ever existed on debian.
Filing bugs against non-existing packages does not work well and
these bugs just tend to get lost. Please file a properly formatted
"RFP" bug against the "wnpp" pseudo-package instead.
Chris
--- End Message ---
