Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:18:16 +0100 with message-id <173314909604.378060.13131001037579177209@localhost> and subject line Re: sbuild: should support -J as well has caused the Debian Bug report #987555, regarding sbuild: should support -J as well to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 987555: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987555 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: sbuild Severity: wishlist According to the man page of dpkg-buildpackage: -j, --jobs[=jobs|auto] ... Will add itself to the MAKEFLAGS environment variable, which should cause all subsequent make invocations to inherit the option, thus forcing the parallel setting on the packaging (and possibly the upstream build system if that uses make) regardless of their support for parallel builds, which might cause build failures... and `-J` seems to be the right option. However, sbuild does not support `-J`, neither does it mention it will lead to an unsafe option of `dpkg-buildpackage`. Please add support to the `-J` option, or at least refer to the `dpkg-buildpackage` man page in sbuild man page.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:36:57 +0800 Yangfl <mmyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to the man page of dpkg-buildpackage: > -j, --jobs[=jobs|auto] > ... Will add itself to the MAKEFLAGS environment variable, which > should cause all subsequent make invocations to inherit the option, > thus forcing the parallel setting on the packaging (and possibly the > upstream build system if that uses make) regardless of their support > for parallel builds, which might cause build failures... > > and `-J` seems to be the right option. However, sbuild does not > support `-J`, neither does it mention it will lead to an unsafe option > of `dpkg-buildpackage`. Please add support to the `-J` option, or at > least refer to the `dpkg-buildpackage` man page in sbuild man page. sorry for only replying years later... in case this is still useful for anybody, you can change the number of jobs that dpkg-buildpackage as run by sbuild uses by putting this into your ~/.config/sbuild/config.pl: $dpkg_buildpackage_user_options = ['-j2']; Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
--- End Message ---
