Your message dated Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:41:56 -0600
with message-id <2802179.mvXUDI8C0e@riemann>
and subject line Re: gs: ghostcript dies when printing to epson r300, but not 
hp lj1200
has caused the Debian Bug report #359821,
regarding gs: /ioerror in --image-- printing PDF with images
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
359821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gs-gpl
Version: 8.56.dfsg.1-1.1
Severity: important


CUPS doesn't print pdf pages with images: the result is a blank page and
a stop of printing job. Reading log file I think that the cause of
problem is gs-gpl (I've the same problem with gs-esp). That's some lines
from log file:

E [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] /ioerror in --image--
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] Operand stack:
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] 
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] Execution stack:
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] Discarding unused printer-state-changed
event...
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] %interp_exit   .runexec2
--nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push
--nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   false   1
%stopped_push   1   3   %oparray_pop   1   3   %oparray_pop   1   3
%%oparray_pop   1   3   %oparray_pop   .runexec2   --nostringval--
%--nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--
%--nostringval--   1   11   %oparray_pop
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] Dictionary stack:
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] --dict:1125/1686(ro)(G)--
--dict:0/20(G)--   --dict:109/200(L)--   --dict:65/75(L)--
--dict:18/24(L)--   --dict:7/15(L)--   --dict:2/15(L)--
--dict:2/15(L)--   --dict:0/15(L)--   --dict:2/15(L)--
--dict:0/15(L)--
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] Current allocation mode is local
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] Last OS error: 2
D [11/Aug/2007:12:10:01 +0200] [Job 57] ESP Ghostscript 815.03:
Unrecoverable error, exit code 1


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gs-gpl depends on:
ii  gs-common                   0.3.13       Common files for different Ghostsc
ii  libc6                       2.6-2        GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libice6                     2:1.0.3-3    X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpaper1                   1.1.21       Library for handling paper charact
ii  libsm6                      2:1.0.3-1+b1 X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6                    2:1.0.3-7    X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6                    1:1.0.3-2    X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxt6                      1:1.0.5-3    X11 toolkit intrinsics library

Versions of packages gs-gpl recommends:
ii  gsfonts       1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre41-3 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
pn  psfontmgr     <none>                     (no description available)

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thursday, March 4, 2021 5:08:18 P.M. CST you wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:56:55 -0500 Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > %%[ Error: ioerror; OffendingCommand: imageDistiller; ErrorInfo:
> > DCTDecodeFilter Input did not begin with a JPEG SOI marker ]%%
> 
> I think this bug (which is the merger of four separate reports) can now
> safely be closed -- we haven't had any reports of it in ten years, and
> if it does still exist it would be in poppler rather than xpdf.

Yes, that seems fair.

-Steve

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to