Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:43:32 +0100
with message-id <905bb07f-87ed-4cc2-9613-5ddfa6cd6...@app.fastmail.com>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024806,
regarding debcargo: crates should Build-Depend: on dh-sequence-cargo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1024806: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debcargo
Control: affects -1 + dh-cargo src:rust-document-features debhelper
as of dh-cargo 30, dh-cargo Provides: dh-sequence-cargo.
the next version of debcargo should explicitly make the generated
debian/control contain "Build-Depends: dh-sequence-cargo". If that's
done, then the generated debian/control does *not* also need to
explicitly Build-Depend on dh-cargo.
This lets us do things like automatically retain Cargo.toml.orig when
packaging crates (see https://bugs.debian.org/1023413).
I'm not entirely clear on the interactions between dh-sequence-foo and
dh --buildsystem foo, but it would be nice to be able to drop the
"--buildsystem foo" argument in debian/rules as well, to keep it as
minimal as possible.
Maybe it's possible that adding a Build-Depends on dh-sequence-cargo
would let us drop the --buildsystem flag as well -- i believe the B-D on
dh-sequence-cargo acts as an implicit "--with cargo" but i don't
understand how dh's --buildsystem arguments differ from its --with
arguments.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.7.1-1
--- End Message ---
