Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2024 11:20:34 +0200
with message-id <Z0Lv4kcEpO4-dFM5@birgitta.local.invalid>
and subject line Re: Bug#974004: Still an issue
has caused the Debian Bug report #974004,
regarding perl: FTBFS on m68k and sh4: qemu-user trashes argv[0] breaking
multi-call binaries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
974004: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: perl
Version: 5.32.0-4
Severity: important
We seem to be affected by #970460 in qemu-user which is breaking builds
on m68 and sh4:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2020/11/msg00007.html
Severity set to important since these are non-release architectures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 09:31:03PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:35:54 +0000 Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 970460
> >
> > This is an ongoing issue that occurred for 5.32.1 too. For future
> > new upstream releases, we could send a courtesy note along the lines
> > of
> > <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/perl-maintainers/2021-February/007086.html>
> > (ideally just before we upload).
> >
> Hi!
>
> The issue in qemu has been fixed a LONG time ago, it retains argv[0]
> since before buster.
>
> What's up here?
I don't know really. All I know is there's buildd logs with the same
failure mode as recently as 2024-09 on sh4 and 2023-11 on m68k.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=sh4&ver=5.40.0-4&stamp=1725235748&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=perl&arch=m68k&ver=5.38.0-2&stamp=1701215410&raw=0
But I've pretty much stopped caring about build results on those
architectures, and haven't sent any courtesy notes for the last three
transitions. Adrian (who originally requested heads-up notes to porters
back in 2020) hasn't complained, so I guess things work well enough.
Closing this but copying Adrian fyi.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
--- End Message ---
