Your message dated Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:29:48 +0000
with message-id <e1sn9ny-003tz3...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066629: fixed in ucspi-tcp 1:0.88-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066629,
regarding ucspi-tcp: FTBFS: tcpserver.c:143:29: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘getpid’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066629
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ucspi-tcp
Version: 1:0.88-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
> -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection 
> -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c tcpserver.c
> tcpserver.c: In function ‘doit’:
> tcpserver.c:143:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getpid’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   143 |     strnum[fmt_ulong(strnum,getpid())] = 0;
>       |                             ^~~~~~
> tcpserver.c:148:5: error: implicit declaration of function 
> ‘socket_ipoptionskill’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   148 |     socket_ipoptionskill(t);
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tcpserver.c:150:5: error: implicit declaration of function 
> ‘socket_tcpnodelay’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   150 |     socket_tcpnodelay(t);
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tcpserver.c:210:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘close’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   210 |       close(fdrules);
>       |       ^~~~~
> tcpserver.c: At top level:
> tcpserver.c:292:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
>   292 | main(int argc,char **argv)
>       | ^~~~
> tcpserver.c: In function ‘main’:
> tcpserver.c:408:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fork’ 
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   408 |     switch(fork()) {
>       |            ^~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:759: tcpserver.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/ucspi-tcp_0.88-8_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ucspi-tcp
Source-Version: 1:0.88-9
Done: Peter Pentchev <r...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ucspi-tcp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Pentchev <r...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ucspi-tcp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:59:27 +0300
Source: ucspi-tcp
Architecture: source
Version: 1:0.88-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Pentchev <r...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Peter Pentchev <r...@debian.org>
Closes: 1066629
Changes:
 ucspi-tcp (1:0.88-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Import the 0006-implicit-declarations Ubuntu patch to fix
     the FTBFS in Debian unstable due to the new compiler warning
     options turned into errors by default. Closes: #1066629
   * Declare compliance with Policy 4.7.0 with no changes.
   * Bump the debhelper compat level to 14 and let it add some
     default dependencies automatically.
   * autopkgtest: code style: use Ruff 0.5.0 with practically no changes.
Checksums-Sha1:
 96c0c29742bdbbd3923b4d606cd496707f86ce2b 2232 ucspi-tcp_0.88-9.dsc
 f7a44c0304cb647584499fa6ff062fcdb89137d3 44672 ucspi-tcp_0.88-9.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e6399aa73f33b63e41dac70bfec6bc0d12c301ebe24ad235d2d7096ab4c035a6 2232 
ucspi-tcp_0.88-9.dsc
 7a0d8b6e737e1650261d0cc1342e7741c019702052449b94f62c46d76e542d8f 44672 
ucspi-tcp_0.88-9.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 f7fdf9b0cd3038d66357e700d4c29f7f 2232 net optional ucspi-tcp_0.88-9.dsc
 8d871023f6538582b4bf4068b962e616 44672 net optional 
ucspi-tcp_0.88-9.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=O4Cd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpUpOu42qlPz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to