Your message dated Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:50:49 -0500
with message-id <87le7ppo5i....@fifthhorseman.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1063558: pgpainless 1.6.6 is available
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063558,
regarding pgpainless 1.6.6 is available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1063558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:pgpainless
Version: 1.6.5-1
Severity: wishlist
pgpainless 1.6.6 is available upstream. it would be great to have it in
debian.
Thanks,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon 2024-02-12 11:18:59 -0500, Jérôme Charaoui wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 10:19:59 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
>> Package: src:pgpainless
>> Version: 1.6.5-1
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> pgpainless 1.6.6 is available upstream. it would be great to have it in
>> debian.
>
> According to my reading of the changes since 1.6.5, it's basically a
> no-op for the Debian package:
>
> https://github.com/pgpainless/pgpainless/compare/1.6.5...1.6.6
>
> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade it nonetheless?
ah, i think you're right that this might not be worth the effort.
Sorry for the noise, i'm closing the bug report :)
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
