Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:16:10 +0200
with message-id <zjieam8ybnd6r...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1037286: transition: libcamera 0.0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037286,
regarding transition: libcamera 0.0.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1037286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.0.5.
The auto-generated ben tracker looks good:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcamera.html
The unique reverse dep (pipewire 0.3.71-1) builds fine with the
new libcamera in experimental.
Thanks,
Dylan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-06-15 23:26:59 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirm
>
> On 2023-06-10 10:25:29 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear Release Team,
> >
> > Please schedule a transition slot for libcamera 0.0.5.
> >
> > The auto-generated ben tracker looks good:
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcamera.html
> >
> > The unique reverse dep (pipewire 0.3.71-1) builds fine with the
> > new libcamera in experimental.
>
> Please go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
