Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:48:24 +0100
with message-id <y8msmb0vliph6...@breakpoint.cc>
and subject line Re: Bug#915612: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#915612: openssl:
"genrsa" changed command line interface in stretch-security update
has caused the Debian Bug report #915612,
regarding openssl: "genrsa" changed command line interface in stretch-security
update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
915612: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openssl
Version: 1.1.0j-1~deb9u1
Severity: normal
Hi,
After this update to stretch-security:
Accepted openssl 1.1.0j-1~deb9u1 (source) into stable->embargoed, stable
the subcommand genrsa changed interface from its previous version, and does not
accept -config or -batch options anymore:
Extra arguments given.
genrsa: Use -help for summary.
I worked around the issue in other ways, and I know that "genpkey" is supposed
to supercede "genrsa", but this problem might affect scripts that the users
cannot easily change, and it's OK-ish for major versions but would be nice to
not affect systems with stable-security updates.
For reference, command that used to work:
openssl genrsa -out "${KEY_FILE}" 4096 -config "${CONFIG_FILE}" -batch
As a workaround with "genrsa":
OPENSSL_CONF="${CONFIG_FILE}" openssl genrsa -out "${KEY_FILE}" 4096
Cheers.
--
Manuel Montecelo <mmontec...@sipwise.com>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2018-12-06 10:56:35 [+0100], Manuel Montecelo wrote:
> But since this change affected us and had to make changes after a
> stable-security release, that in general shouldn't break things working
> previously, I wanted to submit a bug to have a chance to fix things if there's
> anything to fix... Or otherwise, at least document the problem, so if it bites
> other people also using the wrong syntax they at least have some info about
> what's wrong and what to change in their systems, rather than be unable to
> upgrade to the latest version of openssl or spending more time investigating
> the
> problem on their own :)
>
> Thanks for the quick replies and investigation!
closing.
Sebastian
--- End Message ---