Your message dated Sun, 01 Jan 2023 20:49:51 +0000
with message-id <e1pc5hd-0059sp...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1027666: fixed in binutils-mingw-w64 10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027666,
regarding binutils-mingw-w64: FTBFS: patches fail to apply Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1027666: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Version: 9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230101 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> tar xf /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.39.50.tar.*
> rm -rf /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream
> mv binutils-* /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream
> patch -d /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/upstream -R -p1 <
> /usr/src/binutils/patches/001_ld_makefile_patch.patch
> patching file ld/Makefile.am
> patching file ld/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 575 (offset 2 lines).
> QUILT_SERIES=debian/patches/series QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt push -a
> Applying patch debian/patches/testsuite-timeout.patch
> patching file upstream/gas/testsuite/lib/gas-defs.exp
>
> Applying patch debian/patches/specify-timestamp.patch
> patching file upstream/bfd/peXXigen.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 74 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 850 (offset -8 lines).
> patching file upstream/ld/pe-dll.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1230 (offset 9 lines).
> patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 338 (offset 20 lines).
> patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 381 with fuzz 1 (offset 44 lines).
>
> Applying patch debian/patches/dont-run-objcopy.patch
> patching file upstream/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 703 (offset 47 lines).
>
> Applying patch debian/patches/disable-flags.patch
> patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 262.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 377 (offset 20 lines).
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file upstream/ld/emultempl/pe.em
> patching file upstream/ld/emultempl/pep.em
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 390 (offset 47 lines).
> Patch debian/patches/disable-flags.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:71: unpack] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/01/binutils-mingw-w64_9_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230101;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230101&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Source-Version: 10
Done: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
binutils-mingw-w64, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1027...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> (supplier of updated binutils-mingw-w64 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 20:35:22 +0100
Source: binutils-mingw-w64
Architecture: source
Version: 10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>
Closes: 1027666
Changes:
binutils-mingw-w64 (10) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Adjust for binutils 2.40. Closes: #1027666.
* Standards-Version 4.6.2, no change required.
* Update Lintian overrides.
Checksums-Sha1:
e190d8576e8c790a0fbb815c71f7e6ca61ad731f 1890 binutils-mingw-w64_10.dsc
bcc9979272beb4e3c033909962ea307c74da17a8 10220 binutils-mingw-w64_10.tar.xz
eb275b9e20006d13ac1a5e5699ad5174ff9a4548 7410
binutils-mingw-w64_10_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
3ef7610d95c5fbccb14e4c78a56840d25a641e29bf77a59764e8576d6861b0c7 1890
binutils-mingw-w64_10.dsc
53c2164f4e1d445ad2cf62389c4536ee0662eeb2ebeb6122b6b23cdcb61f4030 10220
binutils-mingw-w64_10.tar.xz
3a14f5391bd838b9e065059491134c022be5d2ab485e78034c6e53acf1374683 7410
binutils-mingw-w64_10_source.buildinfo
Files:
621cb079a7a8fa3e3bf4529e98841d67 1890 devel optional binutils-mingw-w64_10.dsc
91cddcc01531385906bdce8cb964e6d0 10220 devel optional
binutils-mingw-w64_10.tar.xz
90c60be3193eb8bcc16c4cd7007df075 7410 devel optional
binutils-mingw-w64_10_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=WbDN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
