Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:27:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#374016: libssl-dev: libssl.pc's Libs shouldn't include -ldl -lz has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: libssl-dev Version: 0.9.8b-2 Severity: minor Hi, There are spurious dependencies in libssl.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lcrypto -ldl -lz -ldl -lz is _not_ needed in Libs (since the -lcrypto interface doesn't depend on -ldl -lz interface) and just brings a unneeded dependencies. It should rather be put in Libs.private: Libs: -L${libdir} -lcrypto Libs.private: -ldl -lz (so that static compiling still works). Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libssl-dev depends on: ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8b-2 SSL shared libraries ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.3-11 compression library - development libssl-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:00:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: libssl-dev > Version: 0.9.8b-2 > Severity: minor > > Hi, > > There are spurious dependencies in libssl.pc: > > Libs: -L${libdir} -lcrypto -ldl -lz > > -ldl -lz is _not_ needed in Libs (since the -lcrypto interface > doesn't depend on -ldl -lz interface) and just brings a unneeded > dependencies. It should rather be put in Libs.private: > > Libs: -L${libdir} -lcrypto > Libs.private: -ldl -lz > > (so that static compiling still works). There are currently 3 .pc files provided by the package: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lssl -lcrypto Libs.private: -ldl -lz /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lssl Libs.private: -lcrypto -ldl -lz /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libcrypto.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lcrypto Libs.private: -ldl -lz This all looks good to me, and I have no idea why any of those are wrong. It has been that way since 0.9.8a-4, so shouldn't be in the version you reported this against. Afaik, -lz was only Libs in the line in version 0.9.8a-3. libssl.pc really should have an -lssl in somewhere, maybe you were looking at libcrypto.pc instead? And that already looks like you've suggested. So, I'm closing this bug since it seems to be invalid, or atleast fixed already. Kurt
--- End Message ---
