Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:57:22 +0200
with message-id <3fd93973-18ac-88ea-d842-0540e413b...@svario.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#681598: /usr/share/pyshared/lsb_release.py: release
detection fails with http.debian.net redirector in sources.list
has caused the Debian Bug report #681598,
regarding /usr/share/pyshared/lsb_release.py: release detection fails with
http.debian.net redirector in sources.list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681598: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lsb-release
Version: 4.1+Debian7
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/pyshared/lsb_release.py
With the following sources.list:
| deb-src http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
| deb http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
the output of lsb_release.get_distro_information is correct:
In [4]: lsb_release.get_distro_information()
Out[4]:
{'CODENAME': 'wheezy',
'DESCRIPTION': u'Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy)',
'ID': 'Debian',
'OS': 'GNU/Linux',
'RELEASE': u'testing'}
When using the http.debian.net redirector, though
| deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
| deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
the detection fails:
In [3]: lsb_release.parse_apt_policy()
Out[3]:
[(100, {'suite': u'now'}),
(500,
{'component': u'',
'label': u'Jitsi Debian packages repository',
'origin': u'jitsi.org',
'suite': u'unstable'}),
(100,
{'component': u'non-free',
'label': u'Unofficial Multimedia Packages',
'origin': u'Unofficial Multimedia Packages',
'suite': u'testing',
'version': u'None'}),
(100,
{'component': u'main',
'label': u'Unofficial Multimedia Packages',
'origin': u'Unofficial Multimedia Packages',
'suite': u'testing',
'version': u'None'}),
(500,
{'component': u'non-free',
'label': u'Debian',
'origin': u'Debian',
'suite': u'testing'}),
(500,
{'component': u'contrib',
'label': u'Debian',
'origin': u'Debian',
'suite': u'testing'}),
(500,
{'component': u'main',
'label': u'Debian',
'origin': u'Debian',
'suite': u'testing'})]
This is annoying, because when using ${distro_codename} in
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades,
Unattended-Upgrade::Origins-Pattern {
"o={distro_id},a=${distro_codename}";
"o={distro_id},a=${distro_codename}-updates";
"o={distro_id},a=${distro_codename},l=Debian-Security";
};
unattended-upgrades fails with
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/unattended-upgrade", line 55, in <module>
DISTRO_CODENAME = lsb_release.get_distro_information()['CODENAME']
KeyError: 'CODENAME'
-- Package-specific info:
lsb_release output
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy)
Release: testing
Codename: wheezy
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
Apt policy
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
500 http://download.jitsi.org/deb/ unstable/ Packages
release o=jitsi.org,a=unstable,n=sid,l=Jitsi Debian packages repository,c=
origin download.jitsi.org
100 http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages
release v=None,o=Unofficial Multimedia
Packages,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Unofficial Multimedia Packages,c=non-free
origin www.debian-multimedia.org
100 http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ testing/main amd64 Packages
release v=None,o=Unofficial Multimedia
Packages,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Unofficial Multimedia Packages,c=main
origin www.debian-multimedia.org
500 http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing/non-free Translation-en
500 http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing/main Translation-en
500 http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing/contrib Translation-en
500 http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing/non-free amd64 Packages
release o=Debian,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Debian,c=non-free
origin mirror.cc.columbia.edu
500 http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing/contrib amd64 Packages
release o=Debian,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Debian,c=contrib
origin mirror.cc.columbia.edu
500 http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
release o=Debian,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Debian,c=main
origin mirror.cc.columbia.edu
Pinned packages:
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
sources.list
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
deb-src http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main non-free
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
/etc/lsb_release
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
- none
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages lsb-release depends on:
ii python 2.7.3~rc2-1
ii python2.6 2.6.8-0.2
ii python2.7 2.7.3~rc2-2.1
Versions of packages lsb-release recommends:
ii apt 0.9.7.1
Versions of packages lsb-release suggests:
pn lsb <none>
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 12.0-1
Closing this bug report from 2012: the `lsb_release` executable is now
supplied by a different implementation that does not use sources.list.
Regards,
--
Gioele Barabucci
--- End Message ---
