Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:39:33 +0300 with message-id <b2a1956a-cb55-bf7a-09a2-cc3d272d5...@msgid.tls.msk.ru> and subject line Re: Bug#886333: samba: cannot provision a domain: ldb_init_module() complains about gpgme_check_version(1.9.0) has caused the Debian Bug report #886333, regarding samba: cannot provision a domain: ldb_init_module() complains about gpgme_check_version(1.9.0) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 886333: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886333 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: samba Version: 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 Severity: normal When running "samba-tool domain provision" I get: # samba-tool domain provision Realm [HOME.WURTEL.NET]: WURTEL.NET Domain [WURTEL]: Server Role (dc, member, standalone) [dc]: DNS backend (SAMBA_INTERNAL, BIND9_FLATFILE, BIND9_DLZ, NONE) [SAMBA_INTERNAL]: DNS forwarder IP address (write 'none' to disable forwarding) [172.18.0.2]: Administrator password: Retype password: Looking up IPv4 addresses More than one IPv4 address found. Using 172.18.1.11 Looking up IPv6 addresses More than one IPv6 address found. Using fd2c:2cdd:72b1:0:62e3:27ff:fe05:eec6 ldb_init_module() in ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c version[1.2.2]: gpgme_check_version(1.9.0) not available, gpgme_check_version(NULL) => '1.8.0' ldb: failed to initialise module /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/modules/ldb/samba/password_hash.so : Unavailable ldb: failed to initialise module /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/modules/ldb/samba : Unavailable ERROR(<type 'exceptions.MemoryError'>): uncaught exception - File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 176, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/domain.py", line 474, in run nosync=ldap_backend_nosync, ldap_dryrun_mode=ldap_dryrun_mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 2080, in provision schemadn=names.schemadn) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/schema.py", line 82, in __init__ self.ldb = SamDB(global_schema=False, am_rodc=False) As this is the first time I'm trying this, it may well be that I've missed something essential; OTOH I'd expect that when installing from Debian packages that any details are already taken care of. Thanks, Paul -- Package-specific info: * /etc/samba/smb.conf present, and attached * /etc/samba/dhcp.conf present, and attached -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers oldoldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.11.3-wurtel-ws (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages samba depends on: ii adduser 3.115 ii dpkg 1.18.24 ii libattr1 1:2.4.47-2+b2 ii libbsd0 0.8.6-2 ii libc6 2.24-17 ii libldb1 2:1.2.2-2 ii libpam-modules 1.1.8-3.6 ii libpam-runtime 1.1.8-3.6 ii libpopt0 1.16-10+b2 ii libpython2.7 2.7.13-2 ii libtalloc2 2.1.8-1 ii libtdb1 1.3.11-2 ii libtevent0 0.9.31-1 ii lsb-base 9.20161125 ii procps 2:3.3.12-3 ii python 2.7.13-2 ii python-dnspython 1.15.0-1 ii python-samba 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 ii python2.7 2.7.13-2 ii samba-common 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 ii samba-common-bin 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 ii samba-libs 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 ii tdb-tools 1.3.11-2 Versions of packages samba recommends: ii attr 1:2.4.47-2+b2 ii logrotate 3.11.0-0.1 ii samba-dsdb-modules 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 ii samba-vfs-modules 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 Versions of packages samba suggests: pn bind9 <none> pn bind9utils 1:9.11.2+dfsg-5 pn ctdb <none> pn ldb-tools 2:1.2.2-2 ii ntp 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3 pn smbldap-tools 0.9.9-1 pn ufw <none> ii winbind 2:4.7.3+dfsg-1 -- no debconf information# Global parameters [global] netbios name = WURTEL-WS realm = WURTEL.NET workgroup = WURTEL dns forwarder = 172.18.0.2 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/wurtel.net/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = No
dhcp.conf
Description: inode/empty
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2:4.11.0+dfsg-1 This bug has been fixed upstream somewhere in 4.10 series. The check is still there now (in 4.16, commit 4ae2fb2e7403191296f7c74f3098fbe121f0796a), I don't think it makes sense now but that's how things are :) Closing this bugreport now. Thanks, /mjt
--- End Message ---
