Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2022 05:14:09 +0000
with message-id <e1niog1-000cot...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#974789: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #959116,
regarding llvm-toolchain-9: Enabling -fPIE by default like gcc?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
959116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: llvm-toolchain-9
Version: 1:9.0.1-8
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

A few package rebuilds with clang fail because since clang doesn't
support Fortran yet, we have a mixture of .o files from clang and
.o files from gfortran, and since gcc enables -fPIE by default, the
eventual link with gfortran fails. This shows up for instance at the
very beginning of the build of the opari2 package with clang:

https://clang.debian.net/logs/2020-02-24-9.0.1/opari2_2.0.4-3_unstable_clang9.0.1.log

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./../src  -I./../src -DFRONTEND_BUILD -DCROSS_BUILD 
-Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c -o foos.o `test -f 
'../src/opari-lib-dummy/foos.c' || echo './'`../src/opari-lib-dummy/foos.c
gfortran  -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
-c -o getfname.o `test -f '../src/opari-lib-dummy/getfname.f' || echo 
'./'`../src/opari-lib-dummy/getfname.f
/bin/bash ./libtool  --tag=F77   --mode=link gfortran  -g -O2 
-fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong  -Wl,-z,relro -o 
getfname foos.o getfname.o
libtool: link: gfortran -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -o getfname foos.o getfname.o
/usr/bin/ld: foos.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be 
used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE

where gcc is clang; gfortran is thus trying to link foos.o compiled by
clang and getfname.o compiled by gfortran.

Samuel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 
'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 
'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), 
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.6.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:9.0.1-20+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package llvm-toolchain-9 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/974789

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to