Your message dated Wed, 13 May 2020 14:49:58 +0200
with message-id <20200513124958.GA298117@chou>
and subject line Re: Bug#859493: libgsl2: move libgslcblas.so into a separate 
package
has caused the Debian Bug report #859493,
regarding libgsl2: move libgslcblas.so into a separate package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
859493: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859493
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgsl2
Version: 2.3+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

Hi,

As a followup from the thread on debian-backports[1], please can you
move libgslcblas.so from libgsl2 into a separate package. This will
allow clean upgrades without conflicts when the SONAME of gsl is changed
and would have avoided the current backports uninstallability situation.
See policy 8.1 for more info about this.

This may result in a transition if there are any packages in the archive
which use libgslcblas.so, because they will need their dependencies
updating.

Thanks,
James

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2017/03/msg00027.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4+dfsg-4

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:45:11AM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> As a followup from the thread on debian-backports[1], please can you
> move libgslcblas.so from libgsl2 into a separate package. This will
> allow clean upgrades without conflicts when the SONAME of gsl is changed
> and would have avoided the current backports uninstallability situation.
> See policy 8.1 for more info about this.
> 
AFAICT this happened:

gsl (2.4+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium

  * debian/control: New package libgslcblas0 to contain the BLAS interface
    library which never changes ABI                     (Closes: #870772)
  * debian/control: Add Depends: libgslcblas0 to libgsl23 and libgsl-dev

 -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>  Sat, 05 Aug 2017 13:40:20 -0500

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to