Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2017 00:54:53 -0500 with message-id <CANTw=MNXapzTyTupeX4etGEii244gB_GpwaTWgom8+==jcv...@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#753692: DDNS vs FQDN generated by dhcp server has caused the Debian Bug report #753692, regarding DDNS vs FQDN generated by dhcp server to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753692 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: isc-dhcp-server Version: 4.3.0+dfsg-1 Problem with DDNS support: If the dhcp server has set ddns-updates on; ddns-update-style standard; # or interim allow client-updates; do-forward-updates on; : zone example.com { primary localhost; } zone 0.0.10.in-addr.arpa { primary localhost; } subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { ddns-domainname "example.com."; : pool { range 10.0.0.100 10.0.0.254; } } and if the client "foo.example.com" has send host-name = gethostname(); in dhclient.conf, then the server tries to register A and PTR records for foo.example.com.example.com. Doesn't sound reasonable to me. If the client's host name is set to "foo.example.com." (please note the dot), then the generated host name is foo.example.com..example.com. Thats weird. bind9 is version 1:9.9.5.dfsg-4 Regards Harri
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---version: 4.3.4-1 Fixed upstream in this version, ISC-Bug #23954. Best wishes, Mike
--- End Message ---
