Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:27:06 +1100
with message-id <20161228122653.gweaqfxwxabli...@benfinney.id.au>
and subject line Re: Bug#323015: dput: make it possible to use gnupg2 instead
of gnupg
has caused the Debian Bug report #323015,
regarding dput: Please give a way to specify the path to the gpg(1) binary
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
323015: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dput
Version: 0.9.6.4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
dput uses a hardcoded ‘/usr/bin/gpg’ when checking signatures. This no
longer works if the user uses GnuPG 2.1 (currently available in
experimental) has migrated her keyring to the keybox format, since this
format is not readable by the 1.4 and 2.0 branches.
It would be great to have a way to point dput to gpg2 instead. dcut
delegates the signing operation to debsign which uses the
DEBSIGN_PROGRAM from ~/.devscripts; maybe dput should use that as well?
Thanks,
--
Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: summary -1 0
GnuPG interaction is now done via a library API.
On 27-Aug-2016, Ben Finney wrote:
> Those interested can subscribe to bug#835598 for this proposed change.
Bug#835598 was resolved in ‘dput’ version “0.11.0”, obviating this
request.
--
\ “I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add.” |
`\ —Steven Wright |
_o__) |
Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
