Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:45:26 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs ware fixed in 1.0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 23:45:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 16:45:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.94]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQZEu-0007Te-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:45:28 -0700
Received: (qmail 629 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2005 23:44:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@66.73.172.8 with
plain)
by smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2005 23:44:57 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:44:57 -0500
From: FX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lower the requirement for libc6 >= 2.3.5 and locales >= 2.3.5 in
version 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
package: libapache2-mod-fcgid
severity: wishlist
Thanks for maintaining this package.
Are the requirements for libc6 >= 2.3.5 and locales >= 2.3.5
necessary? Would >= 2.3.2.ds1-22 be sufficient?
It would be great if the minimum requirement matched libc6 and locales
versions present in Sarge to allow easier tracking of this package in
testing from Sarge.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334011-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 07:45:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 23:45:29 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from desire.arege.jp ([211.19.50.170])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EylWy-0002KF-Ti; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:45:29 -0800
Received: from [133.6.207.142] (cp142.el.itc.nagoya-u.ac.jp [133.6.207.142])
by desire.arege.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46783833D;
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:45:28 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:45:26 +0900
From: Tatsuki Sugiura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: These bugs ware fixed in 1.0.7-1
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
I close mod_fcgid bugs fixed in 1.0.7-1.
Thanks for reporting!
--
Tatsuki Sugiura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
