Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:02:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334758: fixed in portmap 5-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 17:50:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 10:50:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ESI5B-0002Jv-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:50:33 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2005 17:49:56 -0000
Received: from merchante-solutions.com-gw.customer.alter.net (EHLO think) 
[157.130.198.198]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 19 Oct 2005 19:49:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #13881950
Received: by think (nbSMTP-1.00-cvs) for uid 1000
        (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:49:42 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: portmap runs when it shouldn't
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: portmap
Version: 5-16
Severity: grave


Ok so maybe I'm wrong reporting this as grave, but:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#grep 'default' /etc/inittab
# The default runlevel.
id:2:initdefault:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# runlevel
N 2

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls *ortmap* /etc/rc2.d/
ls: *ortmap*: No such file or directory

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /bin/ps -e | grep portmap
 2117 ?        00:00:00 portmap

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lsof -i | egrep -i portmap
portmap   2117      daemon    3u  IPv4   2565       UDP blah.mine.nu:sunrpc 
portmap   2117      daemon    4u  IPv4   2566       TCP blah.mine.nu:sunrpc 
(LISTEN)





---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334758-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 00:11:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 16:11:50 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyeIl-0007yY-9o; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:02:19 -0800
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#334758: fixed in portmap 5-17
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:02:19 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: portmap
Source-Version: 5-17

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
portmap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

portmap_5-17.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/portmap/portmap_5-17.diff.gz
portmap_5-17.dsc
  to pool/main/p/portmap/portmap_5-17.dsc
portmap_5-17_alpha.deb
  to pool/main/p/portmap/portmap_5-17_alpha.deb
portmap_5-17_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/portmap/portmap_5-17_i386.deb
portmap_5-17_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/p/portmap/portmap_5-17_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated portmap 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:59:01 +1100
Source: portmap
Binary: portmap
Architecture: source i386 alpha sparc
Version: 5-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 portmap    - The RPC portmapper
Closes: 333125 334758 340158 342709
Changes: 
 portmap (5-17) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed "Portmap dies w/ SIGPIPE during heavy I/O", closes: #342709.
     Patch by Michael S. Peek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
   * Fixed "init script needlessly executed twice (and it informs the
     user about it too)", closes: #340158, #334758. Patch by Joey Hess
     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
   * Added Swedish debconf translation, closes: #333125. Patch by
     Daniel Nylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Files: 
 32ce92a6d712b72fa0ad4f58de5fbb85 637 net standard portmap_5-17.dsc
 8b0d93319ae503eb45d10c3146b40f6a 21465 net standard portmap_5-17.diff.gz
 726e852fee72c0c1a6c1151999c8d0d5 29870 net standard portmap_5-17_i386.deb
 a324bec8316062f22f82b4bbd211bbe0 29660 net standard portmap_5-17_sparc.deb
 3c036fddc8f9e6023c2551ab999a3069 31680 net standard portmap_5-17_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDzDBEipBneRiAKDwRAnAaAJ0e8B9fo8XqJduZdQgHI0MsQ0OUHgCghsHa
3OF8TZNneQcFd97Fm0Ofofc=
=9Hw2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to