Your message dated Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:51:17 -0300
with message-id <20150812215117.gc11...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#794820: Sorry, it's not ruby-rack's problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #794820,
regarding ruby-rack: High CPU usage in "apache -k start" processes with phusion
passenger
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
794820: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794820
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ruby-rack
Version: 1.4.1-2.1+deb7u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading ruby-rack package from 1.4.1-2.1 to 1.4.1-2.1+deb7u1,
high CPU usage is observed with the two apache "start" processes.
Between them they are trying to use 100% CPU forever.
This problem goes away when ruby-rack package is downgraded to 1.4.1-2.1
again.
The app being run here is puppet master, but the only package being
changfed is ruby-rack.
An strace of the apache processes showed them to be just waiting on a
read of fd #89 (a pipe), but I expect they are multi-threaded so this
was not useful.
Apache MPM in use is prefork, and phusion passenger
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages ruby-rack depends on:
ii ruby 1:1.9.3
ii ruby1.8 [ruby-interpreter] 1.8.7.358-7.1+deb7u3
ii ruby1.9.1 [ruby-interpreter] 1.9.3.194-8.1+deb7u5
ruby-rack recommends no packages.
ruby-rack suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:23:20PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry, this is a mistaken report. The problem is real, but
> downgrading ruby-rack did not fix it, it just took slightly longer
> to manifest itself. So ruby-rack is not to blame.
>
> Apologies for wasting your time.
no worries - I'm closing this bug then.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
