Your message dated Wed, 13 May 2015 21:16:07 +0200
with message-id <20150513191607.gc8...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Unreproducible
has caused the Debian Bug report #440222,
regarding yafc: cannot show remote .dotfiles
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
440222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: yafc
Version: 1.1.1.dfsg.1-2
Severity: normal
Without any yafcrc, connecting on a ProFTPD server, it seems impossible
to list hidden dotfiles:
yafc host:/> ls
en es fr
yafc host:/> ls -a
en es fr
yafc host:/> cat .htaccess
deny from all
yafc host:/>
It also makes impossible to delete a directory containing de hidden file
with a single rm -r, because that does not delete the hidden file, so I
finally get:
directory: Directory is not empty
Then, I can check that the hidden file has not been deleted. Just deleting
it manually allows rm -r to work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (300, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.1
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages yafc depends on:
ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libncurses5 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline5 5.2-2 GNU readline and history libraries
yafc recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-03-13 16:52:17, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> tags 440222 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hello Tanguy,
>
> I can't reproduce this bug with the yafc and proftpd-basic version from
> unstable. As I don't see any changes in yafc that could have fixed the issue,
> I
> guess it has been fixed in proftpd.
>
> If you're still able to reproduce it, please say so. Otherwise I'll close the
> bug in a month.
That was a long month. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
