Your message dated Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:45:13 +0100
with message-id
<CADk7b0OG3dgsrwQv7+bgd1PCcRLhzZV-BW4vKQAk8jL+BTb=4...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#764496: RM: ssdeep/all suites -- ROM; non-distributable
has caused the Debian Bug report #767772,
regarding python-ssdeep: Depends on ssdeep, scheduled for removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
767772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-ssdeep
Version: 3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
your package depends on one of the binaries provided by ssdeep, but it is
scheduled for removal, as described in #764496.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
2014-11-02 18:36 GMT+01:00 Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de>:
> This has been fixed in ssdeep 2.12-1. Thus ssdeep no longer needs to be
> removed from testing and unstable. It still needs to be removed from
> oldstable and snapshot.
Thanks for the clarification!
Package has been removed from stable already (#764937)
Oldstable is EOL, so no chances to remove the package from there.
Removal from snapshot is ongoing (#764938).
Closing the bugs, as nothing must be done from the FTP Team side.
--- End Message ---
