Your message dated Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:45:56 +0000 with message-id <e1vw1co-0007rt...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#726308: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #414397, regarding gnus: hangs when decrypting an armored only message to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 414397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: gnus Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3 Severity: normal Gnus appears to hang when 'decrypting' a message that is armored but not encrypted. A copy of the troublesome message is in the boxquote "*Article*" below. When the article was selected, the mini-buffer asked: Decrypt pgp encrypted part? (y or n) Responding with 'y' appeared to cause Gnus to hang. Pressing C-g then moving to the Article buffer and pressing '| gpg' produced the text shown in the "*Shell Command Output*" boxquote below. Should Gnus not have presented the unarmored text when given a 'y' response to the Decrypt pgp encrypted part? (y or n) prompt? jam ,----[ C-h l results trimmed to after selecting article ] Recent keystrokes: y C-x o | RET C-h l Recent minibuffer messages (most recent first): Quit Decrypt pgp encrypted part? (y or n) Yes Decrypt pgp encrypted part? (y or n) `---- ,----[ *Article* ] Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Laurent Jumet" <laurent.ju...@skynet.be> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user Subject: no-force-v3-sigs Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:25:35 +0100 Organization: Point de Chat Lines: 13 Approved: n...@gmane.org Message-ID: <GED45F18AA7__7523.57538226551$1173457844$gmane$o...@laurent.jumet.skynet.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173457842 24234 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2007 16:30:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: use...@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:30:42 +0000 (UTC) To: <gnupg-us...@gnupg.org> Original-X-From: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org Fri Mar 09 17:30:33 2007 Return-path: <gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org> Envelope-to: pgp-gnupg-us...@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from trithemius.gnupg.org ([217.69.76.51]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HPhyp-0004jU-2N; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:30:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=trithemius.gnupg.org) by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1HPhuQ-0007xd-4f; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:25:34 +0100 Original-Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com ([217.69.77.222]) by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1HPhtl-0007wX-F5 for <mm.gnupg-us...@trithemius.gnupg.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:24:53 +0100 Original-Received: from outmx019.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.4.200]) by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1HPi4R-00039l-FJ for <gnupg-us...@gnupg.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:35:55 +0100 Original-Received: from outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id l29GQj32022167 for <gnupg-us...@gnupg.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:26:45 +0100 (envelope-from <laurent.ju...@skynet.be>) Original-Received: from zebu (234.39-244-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.244.39.234] (may be forged)) by outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with SMTP id l29GQgxI022099 for <gnupg-us...@gnupg.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:26:42 +0100 (envelope-from <laurent.ju...@skynet.be>) ENC: PGP X-Mailreader: GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060326 (WinNT 5.1.2600-SP2 AMD_K7_M6) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on trithemius.gnupg.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-BeenThere: gnupg-us...@gnupg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Help and discussion among users of GnuPG <gnupg-users.gnupg.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users>, <mailto:gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: </pipermail> List-Post: <mailto:gnupg-us...@gnupg.org> List-Help: <mailto:gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users>, <mailto:gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org?subject=subscribe> Original-Sender: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org Errors-To: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user:17852 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user/17852> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZdJmIEgAAe3///nJoRmAH/Niv/3AAf///6gBYUQJIRKgCBAGA EDAAMkCwANlIioNAGmgAAyAAAaA0aAAB6hoaA0YhwaNGgaDQGTEBkaGQABppkAAA wQAGqZNBPFTbVPQnqaBoNGgZNMZQG1AAG1NAPUNo0IVjWWSuyM1TmmqY8NR90zKy 12jrMdhEbD0z16J17Xgxg4pkASOuseqqEE7yFL5TI0IRut11ZSQlwrO5yqFlRiWI oY3zLE4RvcHjpHWA5AQG3yxrwPgstSoX0dgQSpQbHiPy1Cnr8fbsuCJPXTOehj0Z HY7dPzuHCGoCRUIP72fFyI84UC2j0fkC6L6ds7QadpOXxi5MgNxpy4WHp689ua4Z dcig5SYaqfS4eS3xgx/u8ixjEslqSWAVBKMHlHwHf9KQIGTHAtOgciCS9I1P+LuS KcKEg6TMQJA= =WqE0 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- `---- ,----[ *Shell Command Output* ] gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 9 11:26:11 2007 EST using DSA key ID CFAF704C gpg: please do a --check-trustdb gpg: Good signature from "Laurent Jumet <laurent.ju...@skynet.be>" [unknown] gpg: aka "Laurent Jumet (DSS)" [unknown] gpg: aka "Laurent Jumet <laurent.ju...@advalvas.be>" [unknown] gpg: Preferred keyserver: http://users.skynet.be/laurent.jumet/0xCFAF704C.asc gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: C5DD CA28 80E6 1857 BD7E 545F F51D 6DA0 CFAF 704C Hello ! May we assume that no-force-v3-sigs is the default in 1.4.7 ? -- Laurent Jumet KeyID: 0xCFAF704C `---- -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gnus depends on: ii make 3.81-3 The GNU version of the "make" util ii ucf 2.0020 Update Configuration File: preserv ii xemacs21 21.4.19-2 highly customizable text editor ii xemacs21-nomule [xemacs21] 21.4.19-2 highly customizable text editor -- gnus recommends no packages. -- debconf information: gnus/upgrade/pre_5.9.0: false
pgpblNIp6V3tc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 5.11+v0.10.dfsg-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package gnus has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/726308 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
