Your message dated Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:26:55 +0100
with message-id <1379356015.2507.7.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#723044: binNMU: tulip 3.7.0dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #723044,
regarding nmu: grive_0.2.0-1 tarantool_1.4.9+20130611.2012-1 tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4
ggcov_0.8.4-2 (rebuild against new binutils)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
723044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
This actually more or less a replay of
http://bugs.debian.org/714801, http://bugs.debian.org/714809 and
http://bugs.debian.org/714810. Again, grive, tarantool and tulip
prevent updating gcc-4.8, binutils and friends on my amd64 box. ggcov
is 32-bit only, but hasn't had a sourceful upload since the previous
binNMU either.
The last time, Julien solved it as follows:
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 00:40:47 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against binutils 2.23 (Closes:
> > #712181)"
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 01:51:11 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > nmu tarantool_1.4.9+20130611.2012-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against binutils
> > 2.23 (Closes: #712214)"
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 02:59:05 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
>
> > nmu tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against binutils 2.23 (Closes:
> > #712212)"
>
> You missed one:
>
> $ zcat /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/dists/sid/main/binary-*/Packages.gz |
> grep-dctrl -FDepends 'binutils (<< 2.23)'
> -sPackage,Source,Architecture,Version | awk '/Package/ { pkg=$2 }
> /Architecture/ { arch=$2 } /Version/ { print "nmu " pkg "_" $2 " . " arch " .
> -m Build\\ against\\ newer\\ binutils" }'
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . amd64 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu tarantool_1.4.9+20130611.2012-1 . amd64 . -m Build\ against\ newer\
> binutils
> nmu tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4 . amd64 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . armel . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . armhf . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu ggcov_0.8.4-2 . hurd-i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . hurd-i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu ggcov_0.8.4-2 . i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu tarantool_1.4.9+20130611.2012-1 . i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\
> binutils
> nmu tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4 . i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . ia64 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu tarantool_1.4.9+20130415.1808-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 . -m Build\ against\
> newer\ binutils
> nmu tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4 . kfreebsd-amd64 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu ggcov_0.8.4-2 . kfreebsd-i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . kfreebsd-i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu tarantool_1.4.9+20130415.1808-1 . kfreebsd-i386 . -m Build\ against\
> newer\ binutils
> nmu tulip_3.7.0dfsg-4 . kfreebsd-i386 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . mipsel . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . mips . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . powerpc . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . s390 . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . s390x . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
> nmu grive_0.2.0-1 . sparc . -m Build\ against\ newer\ binutils
>
> Scheduled those minus the OOD tarantool. Binary uploads can't close
> bugs, so you'll have to close them yourself.
(I suspect there a no installability bug reports yet. Haven't checked
though.)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 20:53 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Please binnmu tulip. Its binary package tulip-abiword version 3.7.0dfsg-4+b1
> has dependency binutils (< 2.23.52.20130621). However, sid has
>
> % rmadison -s sid -a amd64 binutils
> binutils | 2.23.52.20130828-1 | sid | amd64
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
