Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332124: fixed in tspc 2.1.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:47:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 16:47:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMwV1-0005i7-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:47:07 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 71C0517F72; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:47:07 +0000 (GMT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tspc depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks
cdebconf transition
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:47:07 +0000 (GMT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tspc
This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0
Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.
debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.
This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332124-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2005 05:18:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 22:18:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVj5g-0006um-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:17:16 -0700
From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#332124: fixed in tspc 2.1.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:17:16 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: tspc
Source-Version: 2.1.1-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tspc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tspc_2.1.1-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tspc/tspc_2.1.1-5.diff.gz
tspc_2.1.1-5.dsc
to pool/main/t/tspc/tspc_2.1.1-5.dsc
tspc_2.1.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tspc/tspc_2.1.1-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tspc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:05:16 +1000
Source: tspc
Binary: tspc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
tspc - Client to configure an IPv6 tunnel to Hexago's migration broker
Closes: 304431 308750 331598 332124 332333 335095
Changes:
tspc (2.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #335095)
* Cleanup debconf dependancies (Closes: #332124)
* Fixup source file location in copyright
* Remove freenet6 transition package, thus removing the use of debconf
and the need for translation -- thanks though to all the translators
(Closes: #331598, #332333, #308750)
* Ackownledge NMU (Closes: #304431)
* Apply patches so that unpacked Debian source is sane rather than doing
so at build time
Files:
14da519290e076ad2514ef78770be83a 680 net optional tspc_2.1.1-5.dsc
4e29eb02fb1890eaf1dedc02de7c0c82 10307 net optional tspc_2.1.1-5.diff.gz
904fa0a68d68799ef409aeabf910ac7e 81778 net optional tspc_2.1.1-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQ2MDs2RmcAD8BdppAQIBgAP9GE9BXXuH0CExnl8pMQurNpcSvVTq6T3V
/s/SLmJEmJz2kRYJmCit1UOzCyo/13XPg8K5A+PKlD2Z13efE3PA+i8IGZFlTG3j
quTje001m640kM+SD+ZbcQ9llWaYfEj8oL83MsBCD657IBckliyVX6DYYcmzmYuv
QN7YnoSNWeg=
=G08V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
