Your message dated Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328602: fixed in redir 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 10:32:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 03:32:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGDWO-0002Pq-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:32:44 -0700
Received: from nahar.localdomain (p83.129.33.11.tisdip.tiscali.de
[83.129.33.11])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714EF335A3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:32:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nahar.localdomain)
by nahar.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1EGDWC-0007GF-Hb
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:32:32 +0200
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: very old package, should this be removed?
Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:32:32 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: redir
Version: 2.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose
to remove it.
It has not that many users, there are some alternatives available
(rinetd, xinetd), the package was NMUed and the changes weren't
incorporated and it is quite out of date wrt Debian's policies.
This usually means that your package matched some of the following
criteria:
[1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than
three years.
[2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
[3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
might be MIA
[4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than
100 users with the package installed.
[5] the package was not released with sarge
and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true.
(**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed
more than one month before the time the check was performed.
After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or
ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it).
The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to
proceed.
Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't
help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel
responsible for their packages without needing other people to force
them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing
the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users.
Thanks!
Marc
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328602-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2005 05:38:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 22:38:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETBzC-0000Qp-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:32:06 -0700
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328602: fixed in redir 2.2.1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: redir
Source-Version: 2.2.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
redir, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
redir_2.2.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/redir/redir_2.2.1-1.diff.gz
redir_2.2.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/redir/redir_2.2.1-1.dsc
redir_2.2.1-1_alpha.deb
to pool/main/r/redir/redir_2.2.1-1_alpha.deb
redir_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/redir/redir_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
redir_2.2.1-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/r/redir/redir_2.2.1-1_sparc.deb
redir_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/redir/redir_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated redir package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:54:05 -0400
Source: redir
Binary: redir
Architecture: source i386 alpha sparc
Version: 2.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
redir - Redirect TCP connections
Closes: 139197 147061 328602
Changes:
redir (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (closes: #328602)
* new upstream release, includes upstream's bandwidth throttling
(Closes: #147061, #139197)
* changed flag in docs from --maxbandwidth to --max_bandwidth
to match source.
* changed priority from optional to extra to match override
* redir-2.1.lsm changed to redir-2.2.lsm found at
http://www.ibiblio.org/linsearch/lsms/redir-2.2.html
* debian/control: version from 3.6.1.0 to 3.6.2.1 (no changes)
* debian/rules: now using debhelper, compatibility level 4
Files:
a8c7a428af5cf9749b8c4394156df233 584 net extra redir_2.2.1-1.dsc
4342fadac30504c86c8db7beefe01995 42247 net extra redir_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
0d83559c887a59cd564335b7989fa020 4901 net extra redir_2.2.1-1.diff.gz
64fc25f9881bb67793dd578ca4af1bf5 19080 net extra redir_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
042ba15e00d7783e07620194cf8d4d45 19186 net extra redir_2.2.1-1_sparc.deb
ce3fe2149676877a3fcb2b9de9f882ec 20638 net extra redir_2.2.1-1_alpha.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDWcuCipBneRiAKDwRArOuAJ4pzzpAk75TGaBidBW/O7PDmbpmggCeNqsV
ReMoSXQncIaV+ZoCZsJWzgo=
=NHaJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
