Your message dated Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:05:21 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bubblefishymon: misbehaviour on Linux 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2004 15:27:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 30 08:27:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp08.web.de [217.72.192.226]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1o4H-0005cA-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:27:38 -0700
Received: from [195.158.171.118] (helo=sky.local)
by smtp08.web.de with esmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1C1o3m-0003pC-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:27:06 +0200
Received: from olaf by sky.local with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id
1C1o2l-420-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:26:03 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bubblefishymon: misbehaviour on Linux 2.6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:26:03 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bubblefishymon
Version: 0.6.3-2
Severity: normal
I realized that bfm behaves considerably different when running a 2.6.7
kernel, as opposed to 2.4.22. (I'm quite sure it depends on the kernel,
though I cant verify it's actually about 2.6 vs. 2.4, not some
configuration difference or so...)
On 2.6, bfm moves considerably faster (too fast I'd say), and the CPU
usage also seems to go up -- top shows 5.6 % on my machine (Celeron
450), while on 2.4 it's only 1 %. (Of course, the CPU usage difference
may be owed to different accounting in 2.6 kernels; but the faster
movement is undeniable.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages bubblefishymon depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 1.6.1-3 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.6-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.4-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-0 1.4.1-2 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269053-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 16:05:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 09:05:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESzOV-0001lQ-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:05:23 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so431099nzp
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=odBU8yw0PAYJMR9ZW4TOC8n19Sxw1DQgaM6DRPBDSeqPo2uVy5ru7PZJ7eRJL7sJDty6axlEXnERwbSI04Xv4U6NsDFKPqVvvkKBhpczfNyljabi/6IkvGI71TyBK1BGOPjfssKOVXiqLhsh575v4Js4PT9lr6XIaELoT5blQTc=
Received: by 10.37.13.75 with SMTP id q75mr3341420nzi;
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.13.62 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:05:21 -0200
From: Jose Carlos Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bubblefishymon: misbehaviour on Linux 2.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
I received no more information.
Maybe 0.6.4 version was solved this problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
