Your message dated Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:17:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#227641: fixed in nettoe 1.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 02:53:46 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 20:53:46 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from churchill.factcomp.com [209.5.178.248] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AgbA9-0003aL-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:53:45 -0600 Received: (qmail 10382 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 02:53:49 -0000 Received: from hsdbrg64-110-205-174.sasknet.sk.ca (HELO nova.vor.em.ca) (64.110.205.174) by churchill.factcomp.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 02:53:49 -0000 Received: from tomg by nova.vor.em.ca with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgbA4-0007IY-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:53:40 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tom Goulet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: nettoe: doesn't know about reuseaddr X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:53:40 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 X-Spam-Level: Package: nettoe Version: 1.1.0-1 Severity: normal If I restart Nettoe after it has bound a port it can't bind to the new one. It should use SO_REUSEADDR like Apache and pretty much every other server does. You can see the details at <URL:http://www.ibrado.com/sock-faq/#faq44>. | so = 1; | if(setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &so, sizeof(so)) == -1) { | vomit("setsockopt"); | } Like the FAQ says, there is a slight risk of confusing data... But every Internet server seems to use it. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nova 2.6.1 #2 Sat Jan 10 12:57:22 CST 2004 i586 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB Versions of packages nettoe depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 227641-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 10:17:44 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 03:17:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EStxa-0004sb-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:17:14 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#227641: fixed in nettoe 1.1.0-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:17:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: nettoe Source-Version: 1.1.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nettoe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nettoe_1.1.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nettoe/nettoe_1.1.0-2.diff.gz nettoe_1.1.0-2.dsc to pool/main/n/nettoe/nettoe_1.1.0-2.dsc nettoe_1.1.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nettoe/nettoe_1.1.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated nettoe package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:58:40 +0200 Source: nettoe Binary: nettoe Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: nettoe - Networked version of Tic Tac Toe for the console Closes: 227641 Changes: nettoe (1.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Package is orphaned (see #268125); set maintainer to Debian QA Group. * src/network.c: Set SO_REUSEADDR to avoid `Address already in use' errors when restarting. Closes: #227641. * Switch to debhelper 4. * debian/changelog: Remove obsolete Emacs local variables. * debian/menu: Add quotes to placate Lintian. * debian/rules: Honor DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt. * Conforms to Standards version 3.6.2. Files: 1abdd5f45cc5edd67d97cc3443fefba1 552 games optional nettoe_1.1.0-2.dsc 9e893cb568ba918524e9ab60d9d92ebf 2156 games optional nettoe_1.1.0-2.diff.gz 2c50df5d4521ec3332c401f05c684e3f 19566 games optional nettoe_1.1.0-2_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDWLvixBYivKllgY8RAuQ9AJ9SYvIQAXCHSC1U8iLhk+SATJQ3kQCg1ro/ zCVA/sgFXMzKOfTtGlkrABQ= =6vPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]