Your message dated Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:03:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283963: More info requested
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2004 15:58:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 02 07:58:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from perlsupport.com (mail.perlsupport.com) [66.220.6.226]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CZtLH-0006Ew-00; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:58:03 -0800
Received: from [67.132.206.254] (helo=tytlal)
by mail.perlsupport.com (Exim 4) with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
id 1CZtLG-0007qD-7w; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:58:02 -0800
Received: from chip by tytlal with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CZtLL-00014W-0H; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:58:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hpoj spams lpr.log and syslog when printer is not connected
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:58:06 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: hpoj
Version: 0.91-3
Severity: important
Every ten seconds, hpoj complains to syslog and lpr.log that my
printer is not connected:
Dec 2 10:46:16 tytlal ptal-mlcd: ERROR at ExMgr.cpp:2525,
dev=<mlc:usb:OfficeJet_5110@/dev/usb/lp9>, pid=29147, e=19, t=1102002376
Couldn't find device!
Dec 2 10:46:16 tytlal last message repeated 3 times
Dec 2 10:46:26 tytlal ptal-mlcd: ERROR at ExMgr.cpp:2525,
dev=<mlc:usb:OfficeJet_5110@/dev/usb/lp9>, pid=29147, e=19, t=1102002386
Couldn't find device!
Dec 2 10:46:26 tytlal last message repeated 3 times
Dec 2 10:46:36 tytlal ptal-mlcd: ERROR at ExMgr.cpp:2525,
dev=<mlc:usb:OfficeJet_5110@/dev/usb/lp9>, pid=29147, e=19, t=1102002396
Couldn't find device!
Dec 2 10:46:36 tytlal last message repeated 3 times
This log spam bug is "important" because interferes with e.g.
logcheck, which ends up sending me huge messages; and if there were
serious security issues they'd be buried in the log spam. Also, it
could fill up /var on a smaller system.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages hpoj depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-2 GCC support library
ii libsnmp5 5.1.2-6 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libusb-0.1-4 1:0.1.8-17 Userspace USB programming library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283963-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 17:04:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 10:04:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-88-110-222-19.access.as9105.com (bristol.purcell.id.au)
[88.110.222.19] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECgra-0002qC-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:04:02 -0700
Received: from dell.purcell.id.au ([192.168.3.150])
by bristol.purcell.id.au with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECgrU-0000Up-K1; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:03:57 +0100
Received: from mark by dell.purcell.id.au with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECgrH-0002GT-So; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:03:44 +0100
From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU Linux
To: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:03:42 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Disposition-Notification-To: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.3.150
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#283963: More info requested
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bristol.purcell.id.au)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Monday 05 September 2005 22:48, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:22:28PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > I can't reproduce the same report here. Is the problem still an issue.
>
> I've stopped using hpoj in favor of hpijs. If you can't reproduce the
> bug, I suppose you'll have to close it.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
