Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:41:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#182907: binary-all packages built in binary-arch rules 
target
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2003 21:33:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 28 15:33:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18os8V-000899-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:33:43 -0600
Received: from spampd.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A35C182
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:33:42 -0700 (MST)
Received: from rover.gag.com (rover.gag.com [192.133.104.32])
        by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37688C182
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:33:42 -0700 (MST)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 0863743BC9; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:33:42 -0700 (MST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: binary-all packages built in binary-arch rules target
From: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:33:41 -0700
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian/IA64 non-US
 Build Daemon's message of "Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:20:01 +0000")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
              USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.6c-2.woody.2

This source package apparently builds all of the binary packages in the 
binary-arch target of debian/rules, even though at least one binary package 
is architecture independent.  That's wrong.

The practical impact is that autobuilder maintainers get to manually clean 
up the _all.deb packages every time your package is uploaded.

Please fix this when you get a chance.  

Any architecture "all" binary packages should be built by the binary-indep 
target in debian/rules.  If you're using debhelper, read about the -a and -i 
options, and if you have dh-make installed, a good example rules file is 
available in the /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debianm directory.

Thanks!

Bdale


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182907-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 15:42:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 08:42:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de 
(patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de) [134.93.144.165] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ECfaD-0006k5-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 08:42:01 -0700
Received: from charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[134.93.226.11])
        by patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j86Ffq8R029209
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
        Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:41:52 +0200
Received: from [134.93.226.8] (woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.8])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP 
id j86Ffpwp031098
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
        Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:41:52 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:41:51 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050817 
Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#182907: binary-all packages built in binary-arch rules target
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig924828B91C657DDBDFE954C0"
X-Virus-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Spam-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 134.93.226.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig924828B91C657DDBDFE954C0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Bdale Garbee schrieb:
> Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> 
>>So I can't do anything about that.
> 
> Ok, sorry, I didn't notice that it was a woody-only problem.  Feel free to
> close the bug if you wish, and I'll try to be more careful about that in the
> future!

I'm doing that now, since sarge is released.

-- 
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
      Fax: +49-6131-3922856

--------------enig924828B91C657DDBDFE954C0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDHbi/geVih7XOVJcRAtAdAJ4oTB4mZmOfp2eR5+HJEz/109+a1ACfUBEg
sC/abu9iumkTsJNldb8157g=
=EVma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig924828B91C657DDBDFE954C0--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to