Your message dated Thu, 13 May 2010 00:23:24 +0200
with message-id <20100513002324.2488abce....@firenze.linux.it>
and subject line The requested feature would add more noise than useful info
has caused the Debian Bug report #488099,
regarding apt-listbugs: make bug output easier to understand
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
488099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488099
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.89
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I am a user of apt-listbugs and find the idea of listing bugs very
good. One downside is that bugs have to be manually checked to find
out if and how it applies to the current upgrade.

To be more useful, I am suggesting that apt-listbugs prints which bugs
get fixed by installing a new version, which bugs are introduced and
which are unchanged.

Suggested output for package foo:

Upgrading package foo (1.1-1 -> 1.2-2) will have bugs ...
fixed:
  #11 - foo: displays no output
introduced:
  #17 - foo: displays garbled output
unchanged:
  #10 - foo: it is not useful

This way, administrators can see easier if an upgrade fixes bugs or
even introduces new problems.

Kind regards,
  Bastian



- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25grog5 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt                           0.7.14     Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8               0.3.2      modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libgettext-ruby1.8            1.91.0-1   Gettext for ruby1.8
ii  libhttp-access2-ruby1.8       2.0.6-3    HTTP accessing library for ruby
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.7.22-1 Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8         0.6.8-3    Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby                          4.2        An interpreter of object-oriented 

apt-listbugs recommends no packages.

- -- debconf-show failed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhjfaQACgkQeBwlBDLsbz5+AwCfcGyM0IQ7mY7GaKz5CxeFwBlQ
eJMAniIl1rDJyC65rE0N356ZqNOY7NaV
=u8VJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
quite some time ago you submitted a wishlist bug against package
apt-listbugs, requesting a more verbose output.

Ryan Niebur and I (the current maintainers of apt-listbugs) think that
this requested feature would add more noise than useful information to
apt-listbugs output.
In other words, we agree with Junichi's doubts (see the bug log for
more details).

As a consequence, we are not going to implement this feature.
This message should close the bug report.

Sorry, and thanks anyway for your interest in the package.
Bye.

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
 Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpnD9KNtI6Ab.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to