Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:53:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149058: Additional info
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2002 21:26:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 04 16:26:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 12-222-96-33.client.insightbb.com (yosemite) [12.222.96.33] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17FLp1-0002Ph-00; Tue, 04 Jun 2002 16:26:31 -0500
Received: from sydelko by yosemite with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 17FLoH-0000pv-00; Tue, 04 Jun 2002 16:25:45 -0500
Subject: libssl0.9.6: Mutt 1.3.28-2 no longer works with imap-ssl (gnutls3 
0.3.5-4 and libgcrypt1 1.1.5-4)
From: "Andrew Sydelko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.34
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 16:25:44 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Andrew Sydelko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: libssl0.9.6
Version: 0.9.6d-1
Severity: important



-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux yosemite 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libssl0.9.6 depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

After upgrading to libssl0.9.6 version 0.9.6d-1 mutt no longer will 
connect to an imaps server complaining of "ssl_socket_read (MEMORY_ERROR)"

The current versions of software involved:

mutt 1.3.28-2
gnutls3 0.3.5-4
libgcrypt1 1.1.5-4

libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-2 versus 0.9.6d-1

--andy.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 149058-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 06:54:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 09 23:54:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de 
(patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de) [134.93.144.165] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E2kTs-0004M0-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:54:28 -0700
Received: from charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[134.93.226.11])
        by patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j7A6rqwp020238
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
        Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:53:52 +0200
Received: from [134.93.226.8] (woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.8])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP 
id j7A6rpoR026787
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
        Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:53:51 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:53:51 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050331 
Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Sydelko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#149058: Additional info
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig788DB2B39EBFE2C2AC2E0B3D"
X-Virus-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Spam-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 134.93.226.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig788DB2B39EBFE2C2AC2E0B3D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Marco d'Itri schrieb:
> On Jul 08, Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>  >I really don't know what the problem with mutt is. All the other
>  >programs linked with openssl have no problem. Did you try to contact the
>  >mutt maintainer about that?
> I think upgrading mutt to use GNUTLS 4 will fix the problem, OTOH you
> should investigate if what changed in openssl is a bug too.
> 

I am closing this bug, since openssl096 is obsolete and will be removed
and the problem seems to have gone away.

-- 
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
      Fax: +49-6131-3922856

--------------enig788DB2B39EBFE2C2AC2E0B3D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC+aR/geVih7XOVJcRAgb1AKCNonSH4QrN8oZPqRYVf4u1OMCE9QCfdXQ4
pL0g2d3Ycobhq7P1ItvwXt8=
=d1+v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig788DB2B39EBFE2C2AC2E0B3D--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to