Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:15 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298379: lprng: memory leak back
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 04:19:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 20:19:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s010600e08120dfff.ed.shawcable.net (newmain.materia)
[68.148.200.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D89ik-00022W-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:19:55 -0800
Received: from ghaverla by newmain.materia with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1D89gq-0007Ws-KU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:17:56 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gordon Haverland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lprng: memory leak back
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:17:56 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lprng
Version: 3.8.28-2
Severity: normal
Hello. A while ago, I reported a memory leak about the time that some
changes were done to the main package by Patrick. You thought that they
would solve the memory leak problem. And they did seem to.
Today I was printing some SVG stuff from Inkscape, and lprng started
chewing up memory again. Not quite as fast as the last time, but after
a couple of hours things were getting quite sluggish again.
Do you have a plan for finding out where this memory is leaking? I'm
going to need to print those SVG files again in the near future, so I
can set things up with lprng quite easily.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages lprng depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr2 1.36release-1 common error description library
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
-- debconf information:
lprng/twolpd_perms:
lprng/twolpd_conf:
* lprng/setuid_tools: true
* lprng/start_lpd: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298379-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2005 02:14:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 19:14:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp114-209.static.internode.on.net (mail.enc.com.au)
[150.101.114.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Duhcf-0003Tw-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:14:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.enc.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42281B9BE4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:16 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mail.enc.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (gonzo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 01824-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:16 +1000 (EST)
Received: by mail.enc.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0793DB9BE8; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:15 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:14:15 +1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#298379: lprng: memory leak back
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at enc.com.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 06:49:50PM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> Might as well close this one. Many things have been upgraded
> since then, and I've printed quite a few things (not SVG though)
> which haven't triggered problems like memory leaks.
Thanks!
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer
csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
