Your message dated Sat, 3 May 2008 17:48:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#314302: bittornado: inconsistent units displays
has caused the Debian Bug report #314302,
regarding bittornado: inconsistent units displays
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
314302: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314302
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bittornado
Version: 0.3.11-4
Severity: minor
In btdownloadcurses, the 'size' field shows units KiB, MiB, GiB, etc.
The 'dl speed' and 'ul speed' fields show KB/s. The 'peers' field
shows kB/s.
My preference would be kB, MB, GB. At any rate (no pun intended), both
KB and KiB are incorrect.
Either way, this is a simple text search/replace.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> In btdownloadcurses, the 'size' field shows units KiB, MiB, GiB, etc.
> The 'dl speed' and 'ul speed' fields show KB/s. The 'peers' field
> shows kB/s.
>
> My preference would be kB, MB, GB. At any rate (no pun intended), both
> KB and KiB are incorrect.
Actually, it is correct. The usage is as described here:
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
The size fields are calculated as multiples of 1024, while the DL and
UL speeds are using multiples of 1000. So the units used are correct.
You may say that they should both use the same, but I disagree, and so
does the upstream (it's intentional), so I won't be fixing this.
Thanks,
Cameron
--- End Message ---
