Your message dated Fri, 7 Sep 2007 19:00:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441140: keep this anjuta in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: anjuta
Version: 1:1.2.4a-5+b1
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Please I want to keep the old (stable and reliable) anjuta 1.2.4 while I can
install the new anjuta (2.2.0).
I really want to test the new anjuta without losing the old one.
Thanks a lot.
David.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 testing http.us.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
========================================-+-================
libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.18) | 2.3.19-3
libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.13.2) | 1.18.0-2
libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.15.0) | 2.18.0-2
libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.15.1) | 2.18.0-5
libc6 (>= 2.5) | 2.6.1-1
libcairo2 (>= 1.4.0) | 1.4.10-1+b2
libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0) | 2.4.2-1.2
libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1-12) | 1:4.2.1-5
libgconf2-4 (>= 2.13.5) | 2.18.0.1-3
libglade2-0 (>= 1:2.5.1) | 1:2.6.2-1
libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.9) | 2.14.0-2
libgnome-keyring0 (>= 0.8) | 0.8.1-2
libgnome2-0 (>= 2.17.3) | 2.18.0-4
libgnomecanvas2-0 (>= 2.11.1) | 2.14.0-3
libgnomeprint2.2-0 (>= 2.17.0) | 2.18.0-2
libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (>= 2.17.0) | 2.18.0-2
libgnomeui-0 (>= 2.17.1) | 2.18.1-2
libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 1:2.17.90) | 1:2.18.1-3
libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.10.3) | 2.10.13-1
libice6 (>= 1:1.0.0) | 2:1.0.4-1
liborbit2 (>= 1:2.14.1) | 1:2.14.7-0.1
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.16.2) | 1.16.5-1
libpcre3 (>= 4.5) | 7.2-1
libpopt0 (>= 1.10) | 1.10-3
libsm6 | 2:1.0.3-1+b1
libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1-12) | 4.2.1-5
libvte9 (>= 1:0.16.0) | 1:0.16.8-1
libx11-6 | 2:1.0.3-7
libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2) | 1:1.1.8-2
libxext6 | 1:1.0.3-2
libxfixes3 (>= 1:4.0.1) | 1:4.0.3-2
libxft2 (>> 2.1.1) | 2.1.12-2
libxi6 | 2:1.1.2-1
libxinerama1 | 1:1.0.2-1
libxml2 (>= 2.6.28) | 2.6.29.dfsg-1
libxrandr2 (>= 2:1.2.0) | 2:1.2.1-1
libxrender1 | 1:0.9.2-1
zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1) | 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-5
scrollkeeper | 0.3.14-13
anjuta-common (>= 1:1.2.4) | 1:1.2.4a-5
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:35:37 -0300
David Roguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's ok as long as I have the old ajunta in etch to install while the
> new anjuta is in 'growing' phase.
> when using anjuta-2 i found some thing were kind of broken in relation
> of anjuta-1.2 . But if ther's an anjuta-1.2 in some repo there's no
> problem that the new anjuta replace the old one in sid.
> I believe for the time when anjuta-2 reaches testing it will be better
> than the old one.
>
> please, close this "bug".
Closing.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpoSIPVwx4iE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
