Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:27:41 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291298: should rawdog depend on python-xml?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2005 22:19:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 14:19:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mknod.org [66.101.58.166] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CrOBC-0000EZ-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:19:58 -0800
Received: from quux.mknod.org (adsl-68-93-121-105.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net 
[68.93.121.105])
        by mknod.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 4F6693FC5; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:19:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: by quux.mknod.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id D6EF7154309; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:19:15 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:19:15 -0600
From: Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: should rawdog depend on python-xml?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.5
X-GPG-Fingerprint: A0A7 AE54 665D 6446 F2D9  81FF 8B94 031D 7F75 635F
X-GPG-Key: http://mknod.org/~graham/public.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rawdog
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: normal

I wasn't able to get rawdog to work without python-xml installed for the
few feeds that I tried it with. Does it need python-xml for all feeds?
If so it should probably depend on it, and if not, it should probably
recommend it at least.

Thanks.

-- 
gram

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291298-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 01:27:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 17:27:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mknod.org [66.101.58.166] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D2fsq-0000cw-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:27:40 -0800
Received: from quux.mknod.org (adsl-68-93-121-105.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net 
[68.93.121.105])
        by mknod.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1093FD2
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:27:38 -0600 (CST)
Received: by quux.mknod.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 084605D50; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:27:41 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:27:41 -0600
From: Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#291298: should rawdog depend on python-xml?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: A0A7 AE54 665D 6446 F2D9  81FF 8B94 031D 7F75 635F
X-GPG-Key: http://mknod.org/~graham/public.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 06:19:32PM -0500, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Could you follow up on this bug please?

Sorry about taking so long; I got sidetracked.

> sgmllib is included with python, and xml.sax is imported within a try
> block. It still works with or without python2.3-xml for me.

It works for me as well on a different install without python-xml
installed, so I assume the error was a local configuration error. Sorry
for the noise!

-- 
gram


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to