Hello, At http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/20070513-11:40/overview.log the SPARC daily build, is this text:
| sparc (Sun May 13 13:01:36 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc32_netboot-2.6 failed | sparc (Sun May 13 13:02:34 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc32_floppy-2.6_root failed | sparc (Sun May 13 13:02:53 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc32_floppy-2.6_boot success | sparc (Sun May 13 13:03:23 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc32_floppy-2.6_net-drivers success | sparc (Sun May 13 13:03:29 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc32_floppy-2.6_asian-root success | sparc (Sun May 13 13:03:35 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc32_floppy-2.6_cyrillic-root success | sparc (Sun May 13 13:04:34 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_sparc64_netboot-2.6 failed | sparc (Sun May 13 13:05:41 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_combined_cdrom failed | sparc (Sun May 13 13:06:38 CEST 2007) [EMAIL PROTECTED] build_combined_miniiso-2.6 failed Where it is more or less okay that _root is failed, is it _asian-root _not_ failed. I expect both being failed. In fact I have never seen a failed build of build_sparc32_floppy-2.6_asian-root Why has _asian-root allways status 'success'? Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
