Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line a fixed busybox has entered testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 09:45:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 02:45:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bleep.blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.60]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJ86b-0001Ky-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:21 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i3T9jLpW008830
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:21 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i3T9jLWL008828
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:21 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:45:20 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sparc netinst daily build broken -- broken busybox modprobe
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: sparc netinst 2004-04-27
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20040427/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux dumbluck 2.4.24-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Fri Jan 30 19:06:19 EST 2004
sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-04-29 02:30
Method: How did you install? netinstall cd
What did you boot off? cdrom
If network install, from where? n/a
Proxied? no
Machine: Sun Ultra 2
Processor: 2 x 167 Mhz Ultrasparc I
Memory: 192 MB
Root Device: 9GB Scsi /dev/sda1
Root Size/partition table: 8.6 Gb
Output of lspci:
Serial console
Creator framebuffer installed but unused.
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [* ]
Configure network HW: [O ]
Config network: [O ]
Detect CD: [E ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I needed to use "linux rw" to get the cd to boot.
modprobe of sr_mod failed, apparently it is trying to use the known
broken busybox modprobe. Either the kernel on the netinst cd needs to
include the cdrom drivers, or the full modprobe needs to be used.
(Trying to get busybox to execute modprobe was the problem I was
banging my head against when I paused my d-i work two months ago.)
BusyBox v1.00-pre10 (Debian 20040415-3) Built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
~ # modprobe -v sr_mod
insmod sr_mod
Using /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o
insmod: ELF file /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/drivers/scsi/sr_mod.o not for this
architecture
insmod: Could not load the module: No such file or directory
modprobe: failed to load module sr_mod
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 246492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 15:11:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.182]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BlxPP-0006yy-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:56 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.193.193 with
login)
by smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 22:11:55 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org
[192.168.0.7])
by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EBC2DDC1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BlxPP-000564-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:11:55 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: a fixed busybox has entered testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
A fixed busybox-cvs has hit testing and the initrds so I'm closing this
bug.
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
