On 9/23/24 13:04, Lukas Märdian wrote: > It's sad to see that fellow DDs do not seem to care
It's sad to see that in this and the other thread before, the same weak arguments in favour of netplan are repeated by you without neither adressing the valid points raised against it, nor providing an actual counter argument to the discussion: for every point you're making to use netplan, people pointed out better alternatives to actually do make things better at the source. Or in other words - my impression for netplan in one sentence is "introducing an additional layer to paint over (valid) papercut-bugs rather than fixing them properly in the original tools or documentation". In Debian we stick to do the right thing, so, "thanks but no thanks" for netplan. > about consistency and usability in this regard. like consistency with any other linux distribution? wrt/ sd-networkd: in the broader linux community we've pretty much standardized on systemd as the init system. it just makes no sense to use sd-networkd with an additional layer on top that nobody else is using. that's cross-distro consistency and usability that we care for in the plumbing. Regards, Daniel
