On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:08:37AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> My idea here, which I think would be pretty easy to implement, would
> be to change around the flavors a bit. The default "flavor" would use
> the -idepci kernel rather than the "vanilla" kernel. Vanilla should
> be renamed "full", and the compact renamed "scsi". "ide" should
> (IMHO) be renamed back to "udma66".
>
> Any thoughts on this? Too disorienting?
Sounds good. In fact, why did no one think of this already?
Nils
--
______
(Muuuhh)
Global Village Sau ==> ^..^ |/�����
(Kann Fremdsprache) ==> (oo)
- boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powerpc ... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Josip Rodin
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Bas Zoetekouw
- Re: i386 flavors rearrange? Nils Rennebarth
- Re: i386 flavors rearrange? Herbert Xu
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Stephen R Marenka
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Anthony Towns
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Jeff Sheinberg
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Chris Tillman
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Josip Rodin
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Adam Di Carlo
PGP signature
